Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Centre Opposes Criminalizing Marital Rape, Cites Existing Punitive Measures in Supreme Court

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that criminalizing marital rape is unnecessary, as current laws already protect women's consent within marriage 

03-10-2024
image
   

The central government has informed the Supreme Court that there is no need to criminalize marital rape, as existing laws already provide "suitably designed punitive measures." The Centre emphasized that it is beyond the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to take such a step and that the issue of marital rape is more of a social matter than a legal one, with potential widespread effects on society.

According to the Centre, the matter cannot be decided without comprehensive consultation with all relevant stakeholders, including input from each state. While acknowledging that marriage does not negate a woman's consent and that any violation of this consent should carry penal consequences, the Centre argued that the nature of these consequences within marriage differs from those outside marriage.

The government stated that while sexual relations are expected within a marriage, this does not grant a husband the right to force his wife into sexual activity. However, the Centre contended that punishing such acts under anti-rape laws might be excessive and disproportionate.

To address the issue, the Centre highlighted existing legal protections for married women, including provisions against cruelty under current laws and the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The government argued that sexual relations are only one aspect of marriage, and given India's socio-legal context, the legislature may view protecting the institution of marriage as essential. Therefore, the Centre said, it would not be appropriate for the court to strike down the exception regarding marital rape.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More