Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Delhi HC: 'Thug Life' a Compliment, Bars Unauthorized Use of 'Bhidu' in Jackie Shroff Case

The Delhi High Court ruled that 'Thug Life' is a compliment and prohibited the use of 'Bhidu' without Jackie Shroff's permission 

19-05-2024
image
   

The Delhi High Court recently granted interim relief to Bollywood actor Jackie Shroff, restraining several social media accounts, e-commerce websites, and AI chatbots from using his name, voice, or image for commercial purposes without his consent. However, the court denied similar relief against YouTuber Mahesh Keshwala, ruling that the term "Thug Life," used in Keshwala's video, was not derogatory but rather a compliment.

The court's decision came after Shroff argued that the video infringed on his personality and publicity rights by using his name, voice, and image, and claimed that the term "Thug Life" tarnished his reputation. Shroff's counsel contended that "Thug Life" is often associated with a rebellious attitude and that the video, which included sunglasses, caps, cigarettes, and gold chains, distorted Shroff's persona.

In its review, the court noted that "Thug Life" is commonly used in rap music, social media, and youth slang to denote a tough, resourceful persona. The court found that the term in this context was used to portray Shroff as fearless and bold, aligning with meme culture's celebration of such traits. As a result, the court took the view that the video could be seen as a tribute to Shroff's assertive demeanor and required further scrutiny before making a final decision on whether it tarnished his reputation.

The court also highlighted the importance of freedom of expression for YouTubers, who represent a growing community. It emphasized that blocking such videos could have significant implications for this community and set a precedent that stifles free speech.

Additionally, Shroff's legal team argued for the protection of his personality and publicity rights, noting that he is the registered proprietor of the trademarks "BHIDU" and "Bhidu ka khopcha." They asserted that unauthorized use of his name, voice, image, likeness, mannerisms, gestures, and other identifiable characteristics for commercial purposes infringes on these rights and dilutes the brand equity Shroff has built over the years.

In conclusion, the Delhi High Court's ruling protects Jackie Shroff's image and persona from unauthorized commercial use but recognizes the non-derogatory nature of the term "Thug Life" in the context of popular culture. The case will continue to be scrutinized, with further responses from the involved parties to be considered.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More