Iran has indicated that diplomatic engagement with the United States is moving forward, though officials caution that a comprehensive settlement is not yet within reach as the temporary ceasefire approaches its end.

In a televised address, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf stated that while discussions have produced some forward movement, substantial disagreements persist. He emphasized that several core issues remain unsettled, making a final accord premature at this stage.

Ghalibaf, who led Iran’s delegation during the initial round of negotiations in Islamabad earlier this month, argued that Tehran entered the ceasefire from a position of strength. According to him, Iran agreed to pause hostilities only after its key conditions were acknowledged. He also maintained that the United States had failed to accomplish its strategic objectives during the conflict.

Highlighting the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz, Ghalibaf reiterated that Iran continues to exercise authority over the crucial maritime corridor. He described negotiations as part of a broader effort to safeguard national interests and secure recognition of Iran’s rights.

The high-level meeting in Pakistan marked the most significant contact between Iranian and American officials in decades. However, despite extended closed-door discussions, no final framework was concluded.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh later clarified that no timeline has been fixed for the next round of talks. Speaking at a diplomatic forum in Antalya, he said Tehran is focused on shaping a clear framework of understanding before committing to further negotiations.

Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump acknowledged ongoing dialogue, describing the exchanges as productive. At the same time, he warned Iran against attempting to pressure Washington through actions involving the Strait of Hormuz, a passage that handles roughly 20 percent of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments. Trump reiterated that the United States would maintain a firm stance and suggested that further developments could be announced soon.

Tensions escalated after Iran reversed its position on access to the Strait of Hormuz, declaring it under strict military control once again. The move followed Washington’s insistence that its naval blockade of Iranian ports would remain in place until a broader peace arrangement is achieved.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have cautioned that vessels approaching the strait under certain circumstances could be viewed as cooperating with hostile forces and may face action.

Separately, two Indian-flagged ships — Jag Arnav and Sanmar Herald — were reportedly fired upon in the region, prompting India to summon the Iranian ambassador and express serious concern. New Delhi underscored the importance of protecting commercial shipping and called for the safe passage of merchant vessels.

As the ceasefire deadline draws closer, uncertainty remains over whether both sides can bridge their differences or if tensions will intensify once again.