Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

'No Area of India Can Be Called Pakistan': Chief Justice Responds to Judge's Remarks

The Supreme Court has closed proceedings against Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda following his public apology for comments made during court sessions 

25-09-2024
image
   

The Supreme Court of India today concluded proceedings against Karnataka High Court Judge Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda, following his public apology for controversial remarks made during a court session. The five-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, emphasized that the decision was taken to uphold the dignity of the judiciary.

The incident occurred during a landlord-tenant dispute in Bengaluru, where Justice Srishananda referred to a Muslim-majority area as "Pakistan" and made a derogatory comment about a female lawyer. These remarks, which quickly gained attention on social media, led the Supreme Court to request a report from the Karnataka High Court.

In response, Chief Justice Chandrachud stated, "No part of India should be referred to as Pakistan. This undermines the territorial integrity of the nation." He further stressed that transparency, rather than suppression, is key to maintaining judicial accountability.

The Supreme Court had taken suo motu cognizance of the issue and expressed concern over biased comments by judges, particularly those perceived as discriminatory towards specific communities or genders. In today’s hearing, CJI Chandrachud said, "Judges must exercise caution when making remarks, especially those that can be interpreted as patriarchal or biased."

The bench, which included Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, acknowledged the role of social media in amplifying courtroom proceedings and stressed the importance of maintaining judicial decorum. The court also highlighted the need for clear guidelines to prevent such incidents in the future.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More