Breaking news:
Revanth Reddy Backs Rahul Gandhi for PM, Says His Leadership Can Advance Backward-Class Welfare | Annamalai Takes Dig at BJP-Led Centre, Says It Still Needs ‘Manufactured Enemies’ After 12 Years in Power | Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of Attacking Yacht Carrying 14 Indians in Red Sea | UP Governor Anandiben Patel Urges Men to Honour Marriage Promises, Says Women Should Be Financially Independent
Logo

'No Area of India Can Be Called Pakistan': Chief Justice Responds to Judge's Remarks

The Supreme Court has closed proceedings against Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda following his public apology for comments made during court sessions 

25-09-2024
image
   

The Supreme Court of India today concluded proceedings against Karnataka High Court Judge Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda, following his public apology for controversial remarks made during a court session. The five-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, emphasized that the decision was taken to uphold the dignity of the judiciary.

The incident occurred during a landlord-tenant dispute in Bengaluru, where Justice Srishananda referred to a Muslim-majority area as "Pakistan" and made a derogatory comment about a female lawyer. These remarks, which quickly gained attention on social media, led the Supreme Court to request a report from the Karnataka High Court.

In response, Chief Justice Chandrachud stated, "No part of India should be referred to as Pakistan. This undermines the territorial integrity of the nation." He further stressed that transparency, rather than suppression, is key to maintaining judicial accountability.

The Supreme Court had taken suo motu cognizance of the issue and expressed concern over biased comments by judges, particularly those perceived as discriminatory towards specific communities or genders. In today’s hearing, CJI Chandrachud said, "Judges must exercise caution when making remarks, especially those that can be interpreted as patriarchal or biased."

The bench, which included Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, acknowledged the role of social media in amplifying courtroom proceedings and stressed the importance of maintaining judicial decorum. The court also highlighted the need for clear guidelines to prevent such incidents in the future.

Image

Delhi High Court Reserves Order on AISA President Neha Bora’s Plea Against

The Delhi High Court reserved its order on AISA president Neha Bora’s challenge to a Rs 10,000 pea

Read More
Image

‘Entirely Baseless’: Bombay High Court Rejects ED’s Attachment Case Aga

Bench Sets Aside Attachment Of Pune And Nagpur Properties, Says Transactions Were Lawful And Finds N

Read More
Image

Neha Bora Challenges Delhi Police Peace-Bond Notice in High Court Amid Protes

AISA president Neha Bora has moved the Delhi High Court against a police notice requiring her to fur

Read More