Breaking news:
BJP Expected to Appoint New Party President by End of April as State Polls Wrap Up: Sources | Pakistan Army Chief Issues Stern Warning to Baloch Militants: “We Will Crush You” | Ranveer Allahbadia Announces 'Brother' Samay Raina's Return: "Picture Abhi Baki Hai"
Logo

PM Modi's Ganesh Chaturthi Visit to CJI's Residence Sparks Political, Legal Controversy

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Ganesh Chaturthi celebration at Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s residence has sparked debate, with opposition leaders raising concerns over propriety and others dismissing the objections as unwarranted 

13-09-2024
image
   

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to the residence of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud for Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations in Delhi has stirred controversy, eliciting a range of reactions from opposition leaders and legal experts.

Some opposition leaders and Supreme Court lawyers raised concerns, suggesting that the Prime Minister's participation in the puja at the CJI's home might compromise the separation of powers. Others, however, dismissed the criticism as unwarranted.

Senior Supreme Court lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani called the backlash an "unseemly storm," pointing out that the Ganesh Chaturthi festival holds great cultural and religious significance, particularly in Maharashtra. "It's normal for people to receive invitations for such events. The fact that the guest was the Prime Minister has blown the situation out of proportion," Jethmalani remarked. He argued that while the visit might be unusual, it does not imply any impropriety, criticizing the reaction as "disproportionate."

Jethmalani also questioned the "selective outrage" from the Opposition, referencing the absence of similar concerns during an iftar party hosted by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2009.

On the other hand, senior advocate Kapil Sibal expressed deeper concerns over the public nature of the event. Speaking at a press conference, Sibal argued that such meetings should not be widely publicized, as they could create perceptions that might undermine the judiciary's independence. "No public figure should highlight a private meeting, especially the Prime Minister," he said, warning of the potential implications for the judiciary's image when courts are frequently ruling on matters involving the government.

Sibal emphasized the need to maintain a clear line between private religious practices and public responsibilities for those holding the nation's highest offices. He concluded, "The circulation of videos and images from the event could harm both individuals and the institution."

Image

Former SCBA President Adish C. Aggarwala Urges PM Modi to Rein in Anti-Judici

Senior Advocate Adish C. Aggarwala warns that public criticism of the Supreme Court by ruling party

Read More
Image

Couples Marrying Without Parental Consent Not Entitled to Automatic Police Pr

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that police protection is not a guaranteed right for couples marr

Read More
Image

President Must Decide on Bills Within 3 Months: Supreme Court in Landmark Rul

The Supreme Court has ruled that the President cannot indefinitely delay action on bills referred by

Read More