Breaking news:
After 20,000 Job Cuts, TCS Plans To Hire 8,900 Forward-Deployed Engineers | Bengaluru Teacher Dies By Suicide Months After Love Marriage, Note Blames Husband | Stephen Fleming Ends 17-Year Stint As CSK Head Coach
Logo

PM Modi's Ganesh Chaturthi Visit to CJI's Residence Sparks Political, Legal Controversy

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Ganesh Chaturthi celebration at Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s residence has sparked debate, with opposition leaders raising concerns over propriety and others dismissing the objections as unwarranted 

13-09-2024
image
   

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to the residence of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud for Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations in Delhi has stirred controversy, eliciting a range of reactions from opposition leaders and legal experts.

Some opposition leaders and Supreme Court lawyers raised concerns, suggesting that the Prime Minister's participation in the puja at the CJI's home might compromise the separation of powers. Others, however, dismissed the criticism as unwarranted.

Senior Supreme Court lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani called the backlash an "unseemly storm," pointing out that the Ganesh Chaturthi festival holds great cultural and religious significance, particularly in Maharashtra. "It's normal for people to receive invitations for such events. The fact that the guest was the Prime Minister has blown the situation out of proportion," Jethmalani remarked. He argued that while the visit might be unusual, it does not imply any impropriety, criticizing the reaction as "disproportionate."

Jethmalani also questioned the "selective outrage" from the Opposition, referencing the absence of similar concerns during an iftar party hosted by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2009.

On the other hand, senior advocate Kapil Sibal expressed deeper concerns over the public nature of the event. Speaking at a press conference, Sibal argued that such meetings should not be widely publicized, as they could create perceptions that might undermine the judiciary's independence. "No public figure should highlight a private meeting, especially the Prime Minister," he said, warning of the potential implications for the judiciary's image when courts are frequently ruling on matters involving the government.

Sibal emphasized the need to maintain a clear line between private religious practices and public responsibilities for those holding the nation's highest offices. He concluded, "The circulation of videos and images from the event could harm both individuals and the institution."

Image

Supreme Court Puts Madras HC's Statewide Cow Slaughter Ban Order on Hold

The Supreme Court has stayed a Madras High Court directive that required Tamil Nadu to prohibit cow

Read More
Image

Supreme Court Stresses Fairness in Citizenship Cases, Grants Relief to 27 Dec

The Supreme Court has ruled that citizenship disputes must be decided through a fair legal process,

Read More
Image

Jindal Poly Films: Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLT & NCLAT Rulings on Section 2

By quashing the NCLT and NCLAT judgments in the Jindal Poly Films case, the Supreme Court has erased

Read More