Breaking news:
Saif Ali Khan’s Son Ibrahim Rushes Bleeding Father to Hospital in Auto After Car Delays | Saif Ali Khan’s Attacker Demanded Rs 1 Crore in Failed Burglary Attempt | Special Trains and Buses Arranged for Mumbai Concert Attendees
Logo

PM Modi's Ganesh Chaturthi Visit to CJI's Residence Sparks Political, Legal Controversy

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Ganesh Chaturthi celebration at Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s residence has sparked debate, with opposition leaders raising concerns over propriety and others dismissing the objections as unwarranted 

13-09-2024
image
   

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to the residence of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud for Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations in Delhi has stirred controversy, eliciting a range of reactions from opposition leaders and legal experts.

Some opposition leaders and Supreme Court lawyers raised concerns, suggesting that the Prime Minister's participation in the puja at the CJI's home might compromise the separation of powers. Others, however, dismissed the criticism as unwarranted.

Senior Supreme Court lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani called the backlash an "unseemly storm," pointing out that the Ganesh Chaturthi festival holds great cultural and religious significance, particularly in Maharashtra. "It's normal for people to receive invitations for such events. The fact that the guest was the Prime Minister has blown the situation out of proportion," Jethmalani remarked. He argued that while the visit might be unusual, it does not imply any impropriety, criticizing the reaction as "disproportionate."

Jethmalani also questioned the "selective outrage" from the Opposition, referencing the absence of similar concerns during an iftar party hosted by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2009.

On the other hand, senior advocate Kapil Sibal expressed deeper concerns over the public nature of the event. Speaking at a press conference, Sibal argued that such meetings should not be widely publicized, as they could create perceptions that might undermine the judiciary's independence. "No public figure should highlight a private meeting, especially the Prime Minister," he said, warning of the potential implications for the judiciary's image when courts are frequently ruling on matters involving the government.

Sibal emphasized the need to maintain a clear line between private religious practices and public responsibilities for those holding the nation's highest offices. He concluded, "The circulation of videos and images from the event could harm both individuals and the institution."

Image

Supreme Court Denies Third Attempt for JEE (Advanced) but Offers Relief to Dr

The Supreme Court has allowed certain students to attempt JEE (Advanced) despite a policy reducing a

Read More
Image

Four Indian Nationals Accused in Nijjar Killing Granted Bail Amid India-Canad

Four Indian nationals charged with the assassination of Khalistani leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar have

Read More
Image

CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Supreme Court Judges Plan Private Trip to Andhra Prades

Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, along with 24 Supreme Court judges and their families, will vi

Read More