Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Supreme Court Rejects Plea for Judicial Probe Into Pahalgam Terror Attack, Warns Against Demoralising Forces

The Supreme Court has turned down a petition seeking a judicial inquiry into the Pahalgam terror attack, warning it could demotivate security personnel amid heightened tensions 

01-05-2025
image
   

The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a plea seeking a judicial inquiry into the recent terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam, warning that such petitions risk undermining the morale of the country’s security personnel.

A bench led by Justice Surya Kant came down heavily on the petitioner, criticising the move as irresponsible and lacking awareness of the situation’s gravity. “One must act responsibly before filing such public interest litigations. Every citizen has a duty towards the nation, especially in critical times like this when the country is united against terrorism,” the bench observed.

The petition had demanded the setting up of a judicial commission, headed by a retired Supreme Court judge, to investigate the brutal attack in Baisaran valley, which claimed 26 lives. Dismissing the request, the court underlined that judges are adjudicators, not investigators.

“We are not trained to conduct probes. You want a former judge of this court to lead an investigation — that's not our role. We decide legal disputes, not carry out fact-finding missions,” Justice Kant said.

The court also took issue with the scope of the petition, which later sought directions to ensure the safety of Kashmiri students studying outside the Union Territory. The petitioner alleged that students from J&K were being targeted in the aftermath of the terror incident.

“You’re not even clear about your demands. First, you ask for a judicial probe. Then you want compensation, guidelines, involvement of the Press Council — and now you’ve added students to the mix. You make us go through all this overnight, and then bring in a new angle today,” the bench remarked.

Ultimately, the court allowed the plea to be withdrawn, and advised the petitioner to approach the relevant High Court with concerns regarding the safety of students from Jammu and Kashmir.

The Pahalgam attack, carried out by two foreign terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba along with a local militant, is among the deadliest terror strikes in the Valley in recent years. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is currently handling the investigation.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More