Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Supreme Court Tells Child Rights Body: 'Don't drag Us in Your Agenda'

The Supreme Court dismissed the NCPCR's petition for a special investigation team (SIT) probe into alleged child trafficking in Jharkhand shelter homes, criticizing the petition for being vague and misdirected 

24-09-2024
image
   

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court reprimanded the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) for filing a vague petition seeking a special investigation team (SIT) to investigate allegations of children being sold by shelter homes in Jharkhand, including those run by the Missionaries of Charity, founded by Mother Teresa. The court emphasized that it should not be involved in the NCPCR's agenda.

A bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh dismissed the petition, stating the relief sought was unclear and broad. The justices questioned the appropriateness of the petition, asking the NCPCR’s lawyer how such directions could be passed.

"Do not drag the Supreme Court into your agenda. The relief sought is misconstrued. We cannot pass such orders based on this petition," the court stated.

The lawyer for the NCPCR initially argued that a Supreme Court-monitored, time-bound investigation was needed to ensure the protection of children in Jharkhand's shelters. However, the court pointed out that the NCPCR already had legal powers under the Commission for Protection of Child Rights (CPCR) Act, 2005, to investigate and take action on such issues independently.

The NCPCR's petition, filed in 2020, had sought to enforce the fundamental right against trafficking, as guaranteed by Article 23 of the Constitution, highlighting child rights violations in Jharkhand. It claimed that children were being sold from shelter homes and that the state authorities had adopted a lax approach to protecting minors, often undermining efforts to investigate these serious allegations.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More