Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Bombay High Court to Cancel FIR Against Mamta Kulkarni in Drug Haul Case

The Bombay High Court has indicated it will cancel the FIR against Mamta Kulkarni, citing a lack of evidence in the drug haul case 

24-07-2024
image
   

The Bombay High Court has indicated it will cancel an FIR against actor Mamta Kulkarni in a high-profile drug haul case due to insufficient evidence. Although the court has yet to release a detailed order, it has signaled that Kulkarni’s request to dismiss the case will be granted.

Kulkarni, who gained fame in the 1990s, has claimed that the drug case significantly harmed her reputation and that she was unjustly used as a scapegoat. The bench, consisting of Justices Bharti Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande, found that the prosecution's case lacked substantive evidence beyond the initial allegations in the FIR.

Case Overview

The case dates back to April 12, 2016, when Thane Police intercepted two cars carrying 2-3 kg of Ephedrine, a controlled substance under the Narcotics Act. The drivers, Mayur and Sagar, were arrested, and the consignment, valued over Rs 80 lakh, was found with fake identity cards from a pharmaceutical company.

During the investigation, ten people were arrested, and seven, including Kulkarni, were listed as wanted. The police alleged that Kulkarni attended a meeting in Kenya with one of the accused, Vicky Goswami, in January 2016. This meeting, according to the police, was part of a conspiracy to transport Ephedrine from Maharashtra to Kenya to manufacture Methamphetamine for global distribution.

Kulkarni’s defense, represented by Advocate Madhav Thorat, contended that the accusations were based solely on statements from co-accused individuals and lacked direct evidence. Thorat argued that there were no financial transactions linking Kulkarni to the alleged conspiracy and criticized the reliance on inadmissible and hearsay evidence.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More