Breaking news:
CCTV Captures Terror Attack on CRPF Camp as Gunmen Fire Nearly 30 Rounds in 15 Seconds | Nvidia CEO Projects Normalcy in Staff Address, Sidesteps Questions Over Alleged Affair | Hailstorm Forces Kathmandu Airport Runway Closure, Flydubai Flight Diverted to Lucknow | North India Braces for Rain and Kashmir for Snow; Delhi Temperatures May Dip to 15°C on Thursday
Logo

Bombay High Court to Cancel FIR Against Mamta Kulkarni in Drug Haul Case

The Bombay High Court has indicated it will cancel the FIR against Mamta Kulkarni, citing a lack of evidence in the drug haul case 

24-07-2024
image
   

The Bombay High Court has indicated it will cancel an FIR against actor Mamta Kulkarni in a high-profile drug haul case due to insufficient evidence. Although the court has yet to release a detailed order, it has signaled that Kulkarni’s request to dismiss the case will be granted.

Kulkarni, who gained fame in the 1990s, has claimed that the drug case significantly harmed her reputation and that she was unjustly used as a scapegoat. The bench, consisting of Justices Bharti Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande, found that the prosecution's case lacked substantive evidence beyond the initial allegations in the FIR.

Case Overview

The case dates back to April 12, 2016, when Thane Police intercepted two cars carrying 2-3 kg of Ephedrine, a controlled substance under the Narcotics Act. The drivers, Mayur and Sagar, were arrested, and the consignment, valued over Rs 80 lakh, was found with fake identity cards from a pharmaceutical company.

During the investigation, ten people were arrested, and seven, including Kulkarni, were listed as wanted. The police alleged that Kulkarni attended a meeting in Kenya with one of the accused, Vicky Goswami, in January 2016. This meeting, according to the police, was part of a conspiracy to transport Ephedrine from Maharashtra to Kenya to manufacture Methamphetamine for global distribution.

Kulkarni’s defense, represented by Advocate Madhav Thorat, contended that the accusations were based solely on statements from co-accused individuals and lacked direct evidence. Thorat argued that there were no financial transactions linking Kulkarni to the alleged conspiracy and criticized the reliance on inadmissible and hearsay evidence.

Image

Plea in Supreme Court seeks deadline for safe drinking water, better sanitati

Citing a CAG report that found E. coli in drinking water at some stations, the petition seeks regula

Read More
Image

Big Victory for Tata Power as Bombay HC Quashes Tata Power Land Acquisition

The Bombay High Court has struck down Maharashtra's proposed acquisition of 84 hectares of Tata Powe

Read More
Image

Jantar Mantar No Longer Fit for Protests, Delhi Police Tells Supreme Court

Delhi Police has urged the Supreme Court to discontinue Jantar Mantar as a protest venue, citing ove

Read More