Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Court Summons Rahul Gandhi Over Defamation Case on Army Remarks

A Lucknow MP-MLA court has summoned Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case over his 2022 remarks on the Indian Army, directing him to appear on March 24 

12-02-2025
image
   

A special MP-MLA court in Lucknow has summoned Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case concerning his remarks about the Indian Army. The court has directed him to appear on March 24.

The case was filed by Uday Shankar Srivastava, a former director of the Border Roads Organisation (BRO), who alleged that Gandhi's statements during the Bharat Jodo Yatra in December 2022 were derogatory and tarnished the Army’s reputation.

Controversial Statement and Army’s Response

The controversy stems from Gandhi’s interaction with reporters on December 9, 2022, where he reportedly stated:

"I wagered a bet with my friend that the press will not ask me anything about China. The press will not ask me anything about a country which has usurped 2,000 sq km of Indian land, a country that killed our soldiers in our country and a country that is attacking our soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh. I was right. The country is watching. Don’t think otherwise."

The remarks drew sharp reactions, prompting an official response from the Indian Army three days later. On December 12, 2022, the Army issued a statement clarifying that while Chinese forces had attempted to enter Arunachal Pradesh, the Indian Army had effectively countered them and forced their retreat.

Court Takes Cognizance of Defamation Complaint

Srivastava contended that Gandhi’s statements discredited the Indian Army’s dedication to protecting national borders. Based on his complaint, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) took cognizance of the matter and issued a summons, requiring Gandhi’s presence in court as an accused in the case.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More