Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Karnataka Allows Hijab in Schools, Revises Uniform Policy to Permit Religious Symbols

State government withdraws 2022 dress code order, permitting hijab and other faith-based identifiers within prescribed uniforms 

14-05-2026
image
   

The Government of Karnataka has officially cancelled its February 2022 directive on school uniforms and introduced updated norms that allow students to wear certain traditional and religious identifiers — including the hijab — along with their prescribed uniforms in government, aided, private schools and pre-university colleges.

The earlier order had insisted on strict compliance with uniform rules without the inclusion of visible religious elements — a decision that had ignited widespread debate, particularly around the wearing of the hijab. The revised guidelines now permit select faith-based items, provided they do not interfere with discipline, safety measures, or student identification.

What the New Rules Say

Under the updated framework, institutions must continue enforcing their approved uniforms. However, students may now wear items such as turbans or petas, the sacred thread (janeu), shivadara, rudraksha beads, hijab, or similar symbols traditionally associated with their faith or culture. These additions must blend with the uniform and must not disrupt order, compromise safety, or hinder identification processes.

The government has clarified that no student can be barred from attending classes, examinations, or academic activities solely for wearing these permitted symbols. Equally, students cannot be forced either to adopt or remove such items.

For state and national-level competitive examinations, existing dress regulations will remain applicable. Authorities have directed educational institutions to implement the policy in a secular, neutral, and non-discriminatory manner, consistent with constitutional values such as equality, dignity, fraternity, scientific temper, and the right to education.

Any circulars or internal rules contradicting the new order will stand nullified.

Legal Basis for the Decision

The move has been issued under Sections 7 and 133(2) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, which empower the state to regulate educational institutions to ensure proper administration, discipline, and public order.

While reviewing the matter, the government observed that schools and colleges function not just as academic centres but as spaces where constitutional principles and mutual respect must be nurtured. It concluded that discipline can be preserved without imposing a blanket ban on traditional or religious markers, as long as they do not obstruct institutional objectives.

The state also examined uniform policies followed by Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan during its reassessment.

Political Reactions

Karnataka Education Minister Madhu Bangarappa defended the decision, stating that personal religious practices should not become barriers to a child’s education. He referred to incidents where students were reportedly asked to remove religious accessories, saying such situations had caused distress among families.

Meanwhile, opposition voices have criticised the change. BJP MLA Bharat Shetty termed the move a distraction from governance issues and argued for equal treatment if specific symbols are allowed.

Advocate and Vishva Hindu Parishad leader Girish Bharadwaj also objected, pointing to the earlier High Court ruling on the hijab matter and warning of possible law and order concerns.

Background

The 2022 directive had required strict adherence to uniforms prescribed by respective institutions, emphasising equality and unity. After receiving representations from various communities regarding traditional symbols commonly worn by students, the government revisited the policy.

It ultimately determined that educational discipline and harmony could be maintained without completely prohibiting such expressions of faith, provided they remain within defined limits.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More