Breaking news:
After 20,000 Job Cuts, TCS Plans To Hire 8,900 Forward-Deployed Engineers | Bengaluru Teacher Dies By Suicide Months After Love Marriage, Note Blames Husband | Stephen Fleming Ends 17-Year Stint As CSK Head Coach
Logo

Karnataka Allows Hijab in Schools, Revises Uniform Policy to Permit Religious Symbols

State government withdraws 2022 dress code order, permitting hijab and other faith-based identifiers within prescribed uniforms 

14-05-2026
image
   

The Government of Karnataka has officially cancelled its February 2022 directive on school uniforms and introduced updated norms that allow students to wear certain traditional and religious identifiers — including the hijab — along with their prescribed uniforms in government, aided, private schools and pre-university colleges.

The earlier order had insisted on strict compliance with uniform rules without the inclusion of visible religious elements — a decision that had ignited widespread debate, particularly around the wearing of the hijab. The revised guidelines now permit select faith-based items, provided they do not interfere with discipline, safety measures, or student identification.

What the New Rules Say

Under the updated framework, institutions must continue enforcing their approved uniforms. However, students may now wear items such as turbans or petas, the sacred thread (janeu), shivadara, rudraksha beads, hijab, or similar symbols traditionally associated with their faith or culture. These additions must blend with the uniform and must not disrupt order, compromise safety, or hinder identification processes.

The government has clarified that no student can be barred from attending classes, examinations, or academic activities solely for wearing these permitted symbols. Equally, students cannot be forced either to adopt or remove such items.

For state and national-level competitive examinations, existing dress regulations will remain applicable. Authorities have directed educational institutions to implement the policy in a secular, neutral, and non-discriminatory manner, consistent with constitutional values such as equality, dignity, fraternity, scientific temper, and the right to education.

Any circulars or internal rules contradicting the new order will stand nullified.

Legal Basis for the Decision

The move has been issued under Sections 7 and 133(2) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, which empower the state to regulate educational institutions to ensure proper administration, discipline, and public order.

While reviewing the matter, the government observed that schools and colleges function not just as academic centres but as spaces where constitutional principles and mutual respect must be nurtured. It concluded that discipline can be preserved without imposing a blanket ban on traditional or religious markers, as long as they do not obstruct institutional objectives.

The state also examined uniform policies followed by Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan during its reassessment.

Political Reactions

Karnataka Education Minister Madhu Bangarappa defended the decision, stating that personal religious practices should not become barriers to a child’s education. He referred to incidents where students were reportedly asked to remove religious accessories, saying such situations had caused distress among families.

Meanwhile, opposition voices have criticised the change. BJP MLA Bharat Shetty termed the move a distraction from governance issues and argued for equal treatment if specific symbols are allowed.

Advocate and Vishva Hindu Parishad leader Girish Bharadwaj also objected, pointing to the earlier High Court ruling on the hijab matter and warning of possible law and order concerns.

Background

The 2022 directive had required strict adherence to uniforms prescribed by respective institutions, emphasising equality and unity. After receiving representations from various communities regarding traditional symbols commonly worn by students, the government revisited the policy.

It ultimately determined that educational discipline and harmony could be maintained without completely prohibiting such expressions of faith, provided they remain within defined limits.

Image

Supreme Court Puts Madras HC's Statewide Cow Slaughter Ban Order on Hold

The Supreme Court has stayed a Madras High Court directive that required Tamil Nadu to prohibit cow

Read More
Image

Supreme Court Stresses Fairness in Citizenship Cases, Grants Relief to 27 Dec

The Supreme Court has ruled that citizenship disputes must be decided through a fair legal process,

Read More
Image

Jindal Poly Films: Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLT & NCLAT Rulings on Section 2

By quashing the NCLT and NCLAT judgments in the Jindal Poly Films case, the Supreme Court has erased

Read More