Breaking news:
LinkedIn Mirrors Microsoft, Cuts 281 Jobs Mostly Among Software Engineers | Google Unveils App Allowing Offline AI Model Use on Smartphones | High Court Denies Lalu Yadav's Request to Pause Land-for-Jobs Scam Trial
Logo

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Charges Against Men for 'Jai Shri Ram' Slogans in Mosque

The Karnataka High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two men for shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' inside a mosque, ruling that their actions did not  

16-10-2024
image
   

The Karnataka High Court has quashed criminal proceedings against two men accused of shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' inside a mosque, ruling that their actions did not "outrage the religious feelings of any class."

The court's decision, issued last month and made public on Tuesday, stems from an incident in September last year in Dakshin Kannada district, where the two men entered a mosque at night and raised the slogan. They were subsequently charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 295A (hurting religious beliefs), 447 (criminal trespass), and 506 (criminal intimidation).

The accused sought to have the charges dismissed, arguing that a mosque is a public place, so their entry did not amount to criminal trespass. They also contended that raising 'Jai Shri Ram' did not meet the criteria of Section 295A, which addresses acts intended to deliberately insult a religion or its beliefs.

In its ruling, the High Court agreed, stating that the incident did not have an adverse impact on public order and did not meet the threshold for criminal charges under Section 295A. "It is difficult to see how shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' would outrage the religious feelings of any class, especially when the complainant himself stated that Hindus and Muslims live in harmony in the area," the court noted, as per Bar and Bench.

The Karnataka government had opposed the dismissal, arguing that further investigation was necessary, but the court rejected this, ruling that the charges lacked sufficient grounds and allowing them to proceed would amount to an "abuse of the process of law" and "miscarriage of justice."

Image

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre, IRDAI on PIL Challenging Health Insura

A PIL by Sanvedana Foundation challenges the IRDAI’s 2020 circular allowing insurers to exclude ep

Read More
Image

Delhi Court Upholds Privacy in Alleged Affair Case Involving Two Army Officer

A Delhi court has ruled against releasing hotel CCTV footage in a case involving two Army Majors, ci

Read More
Image

CJI Gavai Blames Lawyers for Vacation Reluctance, Defends Judiciary Amid Back

Chief Justice BR Gavai has pushed back against criticism of the judiciary over case backlogs, saying

Read More