Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Charges Against Men for 'Jai Shri Ram' Slogans in Mosque

The Karnataka High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two men for shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' inside a mosque, ruling that their actions did not  

16-10-2024
image
   

The Karnataka High Court has quashed criminal proceedings against two men accused of shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' inside a mosque, ruling that their actions did not "outrage the religious feelings of any class."

The court's decision, issued last month and made public on Tuesday, stems from an incident in September last year in Dakshin Kannada district, where the two men entered a mosque at night and raised the slogan. They were subsequently charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 295A (hurting religious beliefs), 447 (criminal trespass), and 506 (criminal intimidation).

The accused sought to have the charges dismissed, arguing that a mosque is a public place, so their entry did not amount to criminal trespass. They also contended that raising 'Jai Shri Ram' did not meet the criteria of Section 295A, which addresses acts intended to deliberately insult a religion or its beliefs.

In its ruling, the High Court agreed, stating that the incident did not have an adverse impact on public order and did not meet the threshold for criminal charges under Section 295A. "It is difficult to see how shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' would outrage the religious feelings of any class, especially when the complainant himself stated that Hindus and Muslims live in harmony in the area," the court noted, as per Bar and Bench.

The Karnataka government had opposed the dismissal, arguing that further investigation was necessary, but the court rejected this, ruling that the charges lacked sufficient grounds and allowing them to proceed would amount to an "abuse of the process of law" and "miscarriage of justice."

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More