Breaking news:
Adobe Employee Dies After Alleged Assault by In-Laws Following Dispute With Wife | Neeraj Chopra Records Season-Best Throw at Lausanne Diamond League Ahead of Asian Games | IndiGo Aircraft Hits Tail During Landing at Gorakhpur Airport, Grounded for Inspection | Andhra MP's Son Tests Negative for Alcohol in Aston Martin Crash, Escapes Arrest
Logo

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Charges Against Men for 'Jai Shri Ram' Slogans in Mosque

The Karnataka High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two men for shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' inside a mosque, ruling that their actions did not  

16-10-2024
image
   

The Karnataka High Court has quashed criminal proceedings against two men accused of shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' inside a mosque, ruling that their actions did not "outrage the religious feelings of any class."

The court's decision, issued last month and made public on Tuesday, stems from an incident in September last year in Dakshin Kannada district, where the two men entered a mosque at night and raised the slogan. They were subsequently charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 295A (hurting religious beliefs), 447 (criminal trespass), and 506 (criminal intimidation).

The accused sought to have the charges dismissed, arguing that a mosque is a public place, so their entry did not amount to criminal trespass. They also contended that raising 'Jai Shri Ram' did not meet the criteria of Section 295A, which addresses acts intended to deliberately insult a religion or its beliefs.

In its ruling, the High Court agreed, stating that the incident did not have an adverse impact on public order and did not meet the threshold for criminal charges under Section 295A. "It is difficult to see how shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' would outrage the religious feelings of any class, especially when the complainant himself stated that Hindus and Muslims live in harmony in the area," the court noted, as per Bar and Bench.

The Karnataka government had opposed the dismissal, arguing that further investigation was necessary, but the court rejected this, ruling that the charges lacked sufficient grounds and allowing them to proceed would amount to an "abuse of the process of law" and "miscarriage of justice."

Image

Supreme Court Orders Refund of ₹5 Crore Fine to Art of Living in Yamuna Flo

The Supreme Court has granted major relief to the Art of Living Foundation, directing the Delhi Deve

Read More
Image

Polygamy Back in Supreme Court Spotlight: Centre Asked to Respond as Petition

Nearly a decade after the Supreme Court struck down instant triple talaq, the constitutional validit

Read More
Image

Jairam Ramesh Flags Labour-Law Fallout Of Supreme Court’s ‘Industry’ Ru

Congress leader says 5:4 Supreme Court majority has introduced a new “commercial character” elem

Read More