Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Supreme Court Criticizes CM Naidu for Public Remarks on Tirupati Laddus Without Evidence

The Supreme Court questioned Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu for alleging adulteration in Tirupati temple laddus without conclusive proof, emphasizing the separation of politics and religion 

30-09-2024
image
   

The Supreme Court on Monday criticized Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu for making public allegations that animal fat-laced ghee was used in preparing the famous laddus at the Sri Venkateswara temple in Tirupati, despite a lack of conclusive evidence.

A bench consisting of Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan questioned the timing of Naidu’s comments, stating, “Why go to the press when you yourself ordered an investigation?” The court emphasized the need to separate politics from religion, noting that such claims could hurt the sentiments of devotees.

Chief Minister Naidu had publicly addressed the issue on September 18, though an official case was not filed until September 25, and a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was only formed on September 26. The court expressed concern that a constitutional office holder had made a public statement before the investigation had progressed.

The bench pointedly asked Naidu's legal representative, Mukul Rohatgi, "What was the necessity to go to the press? Shouldn’t religious matters be kept out of politics?"

Rohatgi argued that the petitions were politically motivated attacks by the previous government. Meanwhile, Siddharth Luthra, representing the Tirupati Temple, told the court that investigations were ongoing. However, the court found no evidence of adulterated ghee being used and asked whether samples had been sent to a lab for testing after complaints were made about the taste of the laddus.

Justice Viswanathan stressed the importance of a second opinion in such cases, questioning why further verification had not been sought before publicizing the allegations.

The Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta, was asked to seek instructions from the central government on whether a central agency investigation might be necessary. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on Thursday.

The case stems from allegations made by Naidu earlier in September, accusing the previous government led by Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy of allowing the use of adulterated ghee in Tirupati laddus, which sparked a political row. The YSR Congress Party denied the accusations, calling them a “heinous” attempt to gain political advantage.

The petitions before the court were filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, Rajya Sabha MP and former TTD chairman Y.V. Subba Reddy, and historian Vikram Sampath along with spiritual speaker Dushyanth Sridhar.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More