Breaking news:
CCTV Captures Terror Attack on CRPF Camp as Gunmen Fire Nearly 30 Rounds in 15 Seconds | Nvidia CEO Projects Normalcy in Staff Address, Sidesteps Questions Over Alleged Affair | Hailstorm Forces Kathmandu Airport Runway Closure, Flydubai Flight Diverted to Lucknow | North India Braces for Rain and Kashmir for Snow; Delhi Temperatures May Dip to 15°C on Thursday
Logo

Calcutta High Court Throws Out ED-TMC Cross Petitions Over I-PAC Raids, Supreme Court to Take Up Matter

The Calcutta High Court has declined to hear rival pleas filed by the Enforcement Directorate and the Trinamool Congress over the I-PAC raids, clearing the way for the dispute to be argued before the Supreme Court 

14-01-2026
image
   

The legal standoff between the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and West Bengal’s ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) over searches linked to political consultancy firm I-PAC has shifted to the Supreme Court after the Calcutta High Court dismissed petitions from both sides on Monday.

The central agency and the ruling party had approached the High Court with competing claims following ED raids at locations associated with I-PAC, which advises the Trinamool Congress on electoral strategy. With both pleas rejected, the ED’s petition filed in the Supreme Court is now scheduled for hearing on Tuesday.

The ED has alleged that Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee removed electronic devices and documents, including a laptop and a mobile phone, from the residence of I-PAC chief Pratik Jain and the firm’s office premises during the searches. According to the agency, these actions interfered with its investigation.

The Trinamool Congress, however, contested the ED’s version and accused the agency of unlawfully seizing sensitive political material related to the party’s campaign planning and ideological work. The ED has firmly denied taking any such data.

During arguments before Justice Suvra Ghosh, senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, appearing for the TMC, accused the ED of intimidation and overreach, alleging that party-related data had been improperly accessed. ED counsel S.V. Raju countered the claims, urging restraint and stating that the matter was already before the apex court.

Raju sought adjournment of the High Court proceedings, arguing that judicial propriety required the Supreme Court to hear the case first. He maintained that no immediate harm would result from waiting for the top court’s decision.

The ED had moved the Supreme Court on January 10, a day after the High Court postponed hearings in the case. In its plea, the agency described the episode as a direct confrontation with the state administration and requested a court-monitored CBI probe against the Chief Minister and senior police officials. It has also sought the quashing of multiple FIRs filed by the state police against ED officers.

Reacting to the High Court’s decision, the BJP described it as a setback for the Mamata Banerjee government, claiming it underscored alleged links between the ruling party and private entities. The Trinamool Congress has dismissed such accusations, insisting the matter concerns political privacy and institutional overreach.

Image

Plea in Supreme Court seeks deadline for safe drinking water, better sanitati

Citing a CAG report that found E. coli in drinking water at some stations, the petition seeks regula

Read More
Image

Big Victory for Tata Power as Bombay HC Quashes Tata Power Land Acquisition

The Bombay High Court has struck down Maharashtra's proposed acquisition of 84 hectares of Tata Powe

Read More
Image

Jantar Mantar No Longer Fit for Protests, Delhi Police Tells Supreme Court

Delhi Police has urged the Supreme Court to discontinue Jantar Mantar as a protest venue, citing ove

Read More