Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Supreme Court Cautions Against Turning Legal Battles into Political Warfare Over Assam CM Video

The Supreme Court has advised political parties to avoid using the judiciary for electoral rivalries while hearing petitions linked to a controversial video involving Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma 

10-02-2026
image
   

The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed concern over attempts to drag political conflicts into the courtroom, as Chief Justice of India Surya Kant urged Communist Party leaders not to use legal proceedings to fight electoral battles. The remarks came during a hearing on petitions filed against Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma over a now-removed social media video.

The controversy stems from a clip originally shared by the Assam BJP on X, which appeared to show Sarma firing an air rifle, edited with artificial intelligence to depict bullets striking images of Muslim men. The post, titled “point blank shot,” triggered sharp criticism amid the run-up to the Assam Assembly elections.

Following the backlash, CPI(M) and CPI leader Annie Raja approached the apex court seeking swift legal action against the Chief Minister. Their petitions call for the registration of FIRs, alleging the video promotes communal hostility and constitutes hate speech. They also requested the formation of a Special Investigation Team to conduct an independent probe.

Arguing for urgent intervention, counsel for the CPI stated that despite multiple complaints, law enforcement agencies had not initiated any formal action. He cited previous Supreme Court rulings that mandate automatic FIR registration in cases involving hate speech and cognisable offences.

Responding to the submissions, Chief Justice Surya Kant warned against turning the Supreme Court into a battleground for political narratives, especially during election periods. He noted that while the court would consider scheduling the hearing, it would not encourage legal forums being used for partisan agendas.

The latest petitions follow an earlier plea submitted by civil society members and notable public figures, who drew attention to other alleged remarks by Sarma referencing “Miya Muslims” and accused him, along with other political leaders, of making divisive and anti-Muslim statements.

As political tensions escalate ahead of the elections, the case highlights growing concerns over the intersection of technology, political messaging, and communal harmony.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More