Breaking news:
Adobe Employee Dies After Alleged Assault by In-Laws Following Dispute With Wife | Neeraj Chopra Records Season-Best Throw at Lausanne Diamond League Ahead of Asian Games | IndiGo Aircraft Hits Tail During Landing at Gorakhpur Airport, Grounded for Inspection | Andhra MP's Son Tests Negative for Alcohol in Aston Martin Crash, Escapes Arrest
Logo

Is ₹4 lakh monthly not enough? Supreme Court questions Hasin Jahan, issues notice to Mohammed Shami

Hasin Jahan has approached the Supreme Court seeking an increase in monthly maintenance for herself and her daughter, prompting the court to issue notices to Mohammed Shami and the West Bengal government 

07-11-2025
image
   

The Supreme Court has sought replies from Team India pacer Mohammed Shami and the West Bengal government after his estranged wife, Hasin Jahan, approached the apex court demanding a higher monthly maintenance for herself and their daughter.

Jahan has contested a Calcutta High Court ruling that granted her ₹1.5 lakh per month and ₹2.5 lakh for their daughter. Arguing that the amount does not reflect Shami’s financial capacity or lifestyle, she requested the Supreme Court to enhance the maintenance.

During the brief hearing, the bench remarked, “Is ₹4 lakh a month not substantial?” Yet it went ahead and issued notices to Shami and the state government, giving both four weeks to file their responses. The matter will return for hearing in December.

Representing Jahan, her lawyer claimed the cricketer’s income runs far higher than what has been considered so far. He told the court that Shami owns properties worth hundreds of crores, drives high-end cars, travels abroad frequently, and enjoys a lavish lifestyle.

The petition also alleged that the bowler had failed to make several payments despite earlier directives from the family court and the Calcutta High Court. Jahan insisted that although she is not seeking a share of Shami’s wealth, their daughter deserves a standard of living comparable to that of her father. The plea stated that the child is entitled to the same quality of education, social circle, and dignity.

The case adds another layer to the years-long dispute between the two, which began in 2018 after Jahan accused Shami of domestic violence, financial mismanagement, and dowry-related harassment. The conflict has continued to unfold in courtrooms as well as in public.

Shami—who remains active in international cricket—has repeatedly chosen to keep his personal issues private, saying in past interviews that he prefers to concentrate on his game.

With the Supreme Court issuing fresh notices, both Shami and the West Bengal government will now have to present their submissions before the next hearing in December.

Image

Supreme Court Orders Refund of ₹5 Crore Fine to Art of Living in Yamuna Flo

The Supreme Court has granted major relief to the Art of Living Foundation, directing the Delhi Deve

Read More
Image

Polygamy Back in Supreme Court Spotlight: Centre Asked to Respond as Petition

Nearly a decade after the Supreme Court struck down instant triple talaq, the constitutional validit

Read More
Image

Jairam Ramesh Flags Labour-Law Fallout Of Supreme Court’s ‘Industry’ Ru

Congress leader says 5:4 Supreme Court majority has introduced a new “commercial character” elem

Read More