Breaking news:
Bankipur Bypoll Results 2026 Live: Prashant Kishor surges ahead in BJP bastion | Raj Thackeray questions Vivek Oberoi, Madhavan over patriotism: 'Why settle in Dubai?' | NTA seeks 24x7 protection for question papers with ₹7.5-crore contract after NEET row | Delhi High Court reassigns judge handling paper leak cases to anti-terror bench | IndiGo to halt London operations as Boeing 787 lease ends in October | Farmers' interests above politics, says Shivakumar at all-party Cauvery meeting
Logo

Mumbai Court Orders Probe Against Shilpa Shetty and Raj Kundra Over Alleged Gold Scheme Fraud

A Mumbai Sessions Court has directed police to investigate allegations of fraud against Shilpa Shetty and Raj Kundra related to a gold investment scheme, following a complaint by a bullion trader 

13-06-2024
image
   

A Mumbai Sessions Court ruled on Wednesday that a prima facie cognisable offence exists against actor Shilpa Shetty and her husband, businessman Raj Kundra, in connection with a case filed by bullion trader Prithviraj Saremal Kothari. The court directed the BKC police to investigate allegations of cheating made in Kothari's complaint.

The case revolves around Shetty and Kundra's company, Satyug Gold Private Limited, which allegedly launched a scheme in 2014 promising investors discounted rates on gold upfront with guaranteed delivery on a future date. Kothari, the complainant, invested Rs 90 lakhs expecting to receive 5,000 grams of 24-carat gold after five years, regardless of market fluctuations. However, upon maturity in April 2019, he claimed he did not receive the gold as promised.

Kothari further alleged that a postdated cheque issued by the company in January 2020 only covered the principal amount, significantly undervaluing the promised gold considering market rates.

Advocates representing Kothari argued that despite filing a complaint with the BKC police, no FIR was registered, prompting their appeal to the Sessions Court to direct police action.

Shetty, Kundra, and other company directors were not present in court during the proceedings. The court's decision empowers the police to register an FIR under relevant sections of the IPC and the MPID Act if a cognisable offence is found in the investigation.

Image

Supreme Court stays MHADA's Bandra-Worli cluster redevelopment; key battle ov

The State of Maharashtra and MHADA were represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, along with se

Read More
Image

Over 80,000 high court cases pending for 30 years as judicial backlog crosses

The Centre has informed Parliament that India's courts are grappling with an enormous backlog, with

Read More
Image

Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict in Goa's Appeal Against Tarun Tejpal Acqui

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court has concluded hearings in the Tarun Tejpal sexual assault cas

Read More