Breaking news:
CCTV Captures Terror Attack on CRPF Camp as Gunmen Fire Nearly 30 Rounds in 15 Seconds | Nvidia CEO Projects Normalcy in Staff Address, Sidesteps Questions Over Alleged Affair | Hailstorm Forces Kathmandu Airport Runway Closure, Flydubai Flight Diverted to Lucknow | North India Braces for Rain and Kashmir for Snow; Delhi Temperatures May Dip to 15°C on Thursday
Logo

SC Notice on Plea Over Sridevi's Chennai Property Dispute

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a plea challenging the Madras High Court's dismissal of a property dispute involving a 2.7-acre Chennai plot purchased by late actor Sridevi's family in 1988 

16-09-2026
image
   

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a plea challenging a Madras High Court order that dismissed a suit over a 2.7-acre property in Chennai purchased by late actor Sridevi's family in 1988.

A bench of Justices KV Viswanathan and Arun Palli directed parties to maintain status quo on the property until the next hearing.

MC Sivakami and her brother claim a share in the East Coast Road property and had filed a suit against Sridevi's husband Boney Kapoor, daughters Janhvi Kapoor and Khushi Kapoor, and others.

What is the dispute?

The property was sold to Sridevi's family through a sale deed dated April 19, 1988. Sivakami challenged the dismissal of her suit, arguing that the trial court had found a prima facie cause of action and that the claim was within the limitation period.

Her lawyers, Senior Advocate Raju Ramachandran and Advocate Balaji Srinivasan, argued that the Madras High Court went into the merits of documents and questions of legal heirship at the preliminary stage, effectively conducting a "mini-trial".

The Kapoor family's counsel, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, argued that the property transaction was nearly three decades old and that the 2025 suit was barred by limitation. He also referred to the petitioners having attained adulthood in 1995 and 1999.

Supreme Court suggests mediation

During the hearing, the bench questioned the parties about the ownership share of MC Chandrasekaran, who had sold the property, and the petitioners' claim that they were his children.

The court also suggested resolving the dispute through mediation and said a retired High Court judge would be appointed as mediator.

The matter has been listed for December 18 to consider the mediation proceedings. For now, the status quo order remains in place.

Image

Plea in Supreme Court seeks deadline for safe drinking water, better sanitati

Citing a CAG report that found E. coli in drinking water at some stations, the petition seeks regula

Read More
Image

Big Victory for Tata Power as Bombay HC Quashes Tata Power Land Acquisition

The Bombay High Court has struck down Maharashtra's proposed acquisition of 84 hectares of Tata Powe

Read More
Image

Jantar Mantar No Longer Fit for Protests, Delhi Police Tells Supreme Court

Delhi Police has urged the Supreme Court to discontinue Jantar Mantar as a protest venue, citing ove

Read More